GSM Handsets
Public law help please anyone help me :o(?
Heya i was just wondering if someone NE1 lol could help me, ive been asked to do a research log (which i have never done before) on the following questions, if u could please point me in the right deirection i would be most greatful or even some books which could help me just im reeli struggling
Governmental policy to support stem cell research has resulted in the adoption of opposing views by groups within society who are either passionately in favour of the potential medical and scientific benefits or passionately opposed on the grounds of their religious and morally related beliefs.
Pro Embryo is a group committed to preventing further scientific experimentation on embryos. The group is based in London and led by Chris and Nazeem.
BioMedic is a company created by statute – the Emryology Act 2006 ( a fictitious measure). It is predominantly engaged in scientific research into embryos. The company is based in Wulfrun
Two months ago an incendiary device was placed under the car of one of the Directors of Bio Medic. It blew up causing damage to property. The police are currently investigating the incident but have few leads other than a description of three men seen running away from the area shortly before the device blew up.
Question 1.
As a public law company the duties and powers of Bio Medic are defined by statute. Section 2 of the Embryology Act states that all experiments, prior to commencement, conducted by Bio Medic, must receive the approval of a committee of the House of Lords. It comes to light that experimentation has been conducted without that prior approval.
Explain whether the decision could be challenged and on what basis.
Question Two
Two weeks ago Chris and Nazeem organised a demonstration against the policies of the government in relation to embryo research and specifically the activities of Bio Medic. It was proposed to march through the centre of Wulfrun with a view to arriving outside the headquarters of Bio Medic. They gave notice to the Chief Constable for the area. Conditions were imposed, in that the march had to terminate in the local park.and no more than 100 could participate.
Consider whether such conditions were lawful. Could the police have banned the march.
Question Three
During the march the following events occurred.
(i)Phillip was carrying a placard depicting graphic scenes of mutilated embryos. William, an observer, was distressed by the images – his wife had recently lost a child during pregnancy. An argument broke out between the two and the police arrested Phillip.
(ii)Henry and Emma split away from the main group and began to address some passers by about the morality of experimentation. They were immediately arrested by the police on the grounds that a breach of the peace might result.
Were the arrests of Phillip, Henry and Emma lawful.
Question Four
The march begins to break up. James, Imran and John dash through a police cordon and run from the local park towards the headquarters of Bio Medic. It is their intention to deliver a petition in a large envelope to the reception desk containing 10,000 names. P.C Broad and PC Collins are on duty outside Bio Medic and because of the recent bombing and threats received by Bio Medic they are armed. PC Broad receives information over his phone that James, Imran and John are on their way and that they match the description of the three men seen running away from the earlier incident regarding the bombed car. When the three men arrive at Bio Medic PC Broad challenges them to stop. He is ignored and concluding that the package is a bomb shoots and kills James as James enters the building. Following the controversy that erupts the Chief Constable makes it clear two weeks later that there will be no enquiry into the incident.
Explain whether the events could amount to a violation of Article 2 of the ECHR
The Home Secretary proposes to introduce legislation before Parliament which reflects public concern regarding acts of extreme violence. A Bill is drafted which will permit the security forces to detain suspects for up to 42 days before charge and, where the suspicion amounts to a near certainty, for suspects to be kept in solitary confinement and for “aggressive” interrogation techniques to be used . It is the intention of the Home Secretary to derogate from the relevant articles of the ECHR.
Advise the Home Secretary as to whether the government can expect to succeed in getting these provisions onto the statute book.
if u want someone to answer your question make it shorter
One Response to “Public law help please anyone help me :o(?”
Leave a Reply
October 16th, 2009
Posted by admin in imaging center phone | 1 Comment »
if u want someone to answer your question make it shorter
References :